Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir and claims about the validation of the memoir
The article states that Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir is invalidate and provides three argumentation of support. However the professor explains that the memoir is accurate and reliable and refutes of the author's reasons.
First, the reading provides an example which is against the Chevalier's claims about his wealthy life in Switzerland. The professor refutes this point by saying that Chevalier was prosperous in Switzerland and spend most of his money on party and gambling. She also mentions that converting his asserts to money took times and because of this Chevalier had to get loan from merchants.
Second, the author of the reading notes that there are a several questions and doubts about the accuracy of Chevalier conversations with the well-known writer Voltaire which was recorded. The professor mentions that record is accurate and valid because at that time Chevalier used to note his talks with Voltaire at each night after the talking. The professor states that after some years Chevalier refers to his notes in order to record the conversations.
Third, the article claims that there are several questions about the Chevalier's escape of a secure prison in Venice. The professor, on the other hand, disagrees with this idea by providing some facts. She mentions that there are other prisoners at that time who had more influential connections that Chevalier which made it probable to bribing but they could not. Therefore, the professor rejects the idea of offering bribe by Chevalier. She puts forth the idea that there are evidences which show the prison had repaired after the Chevalier's escape.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'invalidated'.
Suggestion: invalidated
...s that Chevalier de Seingalts memoir is invalidate and provides three argumentation of sup...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rovides three argumentation of support. However the professor explains that the memoir ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23461538462 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63861571651 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511538461538 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2285182172 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230306538591 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082474467964 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798813632461 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14825360816 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876225479703 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.