Chevalier memoir
While the passage claims that the memoir by Chevalier is considered inaccurate in many ways by the critics, the speaker states that the memoir is in fact pretty accurate and provides evidences for the same.
First, it is a well known fact that Chevalier had many assets. And to spend money for the parties and gambling, Chevalier had to sell his assets. But he couldn't get the money in time and so had to borrow money from the merchants. So the speaker states that Chevalier borrowed money does not imply that he was poor contrary to what has been stated in the passage.
Second, Chevalier used to have long conversations with Voltaire every night and took notes of the conversations on daily basis. While writing the memoir, Chevalier used to go through the notes. Everybody knows that Chevalier used to refer notes and journals while writing the memoir. This is in contradiction to what has been suggested in the passage that Chevalier would not remember the conversations accurately to write them in the memoir which was written long after these conversations took place.
Finally, the passage states that Chevalier escaped from the prison by making a hole in the roof with a small metal piece is a lie and claims that he got out of prison by bribing the prison jailers. However, the speaker argues that, in contrast, there are other prisoners as well who had politically influential friends. But they could not find their way to freedom with their friends. Moreover, old Venician documents show that the prison in which Chevalier was prisoned needed a repair to the roof. These evidence strongly suggest that Chevalier had escaped through the roof.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Haleh Rezazadeh | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | joyce05 | 3 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | theprasad | 70 | view |
- Chaco structures 78
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 58
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 16
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 62
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...hevalier had to sell his assets. But he couldnt get the money in time and so had to bor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, well, while, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92170818505 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53051687598 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508896797153 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2738081682 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386441960226 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148104731391 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121518291834 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24109191287 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1123334805 0.0443174109184 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.