coal industry
While the passage provide solutions to reduce the pollution caused by coal industry, the lecturer discloses information that suggests that the solutions provided in the passage are not worthy enough implementing.
Firstly, combustion of coal is a major contributor of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. There are two ways of burning coal - electric combustion and combustion with the help of natural gas. Though the usage of natural gas to burn coal produces lesser carbon dioxide, large amounts of solid wastes are produced which can contribute to polluting the environment. Thus, improving the reaction efficiency to reduce the pollution as mentioned in the passage is not an effective solution.
Secondly, though flushing the coal with water in order to remove sulfides prevents the formation of sulfur dioxide in the air, the washed out sulfides are diverted into water bodies which will result in the formation of H2SO2. This compound is acidic in nature and will acidify the ambient ecosystem. Thus, flushing the coal with water as recommended in the passage will result in a different form of pollution, there by making this practice futile.
Finally, there are no technologically advanced techniques to collect the emitted carbon dioxide presently. Moreover, it is very costly to develop such technology and even if developed, the captured carbon dioxide has to be discarded somewhere. Ultimately, the discarded carbon dioxide will find its way back into the environment. Thus, in contrast to what has been stated in the passage regarding collection of emitted carbon dioxide, this method is not feasible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38976377953 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82072300618 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547244094488 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9127440634 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133395870571 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514756229941 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545460423247 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818967213299 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532080329282 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.