Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin

Essay topics:

Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

It is important to know or have an idea about the past as it can help one take important decisions today. It is knowledge on the past that helps one move forward at faster pace than otherwise would have. One cannot downpaly the importance of knowing the past to make crucial decisions.

One can learn a lot from what had happened in the past. By knowing the past, one can easily gauge what works and what do not. It is this knowledge on the past that can make a person evolve into a better person. There is a witty quote that says, "Learn from others' mistakes as one lifetime won't be sufficient to learn from ones own mistakes". Having a knowledge about the past not only helps in making important decisions but also saves the precisious time. For example, a scientist who is just getting started with career can have a fruitful start only if had knowledge about what didn't work and what worked in the past. If the scientist didn't know what had happened in the past, the scientist would waste the same amount of time or even worse, more time than it had already taken in the past only to know that something doesn't work. It is this knowledge on the past that is taking the human civilization forward by leaps and bounds.

This is not just limited to the scientists or researchers. For example, let us consider the case of a big tech company. It would be very adventageous for the whole company if the spearheads of the company have knowledge of things that worked or didn't work in the past. In this rapidly evolving technological world, one needs keep abreast of technological failures and successes that took place in the past. For a innovative technology company, where time is one of the most important aspects of the company's success, it would be very indiscriminate for a person to start working on a new idea without considering how things worked about a similar idea in the past only to find out that there is nothing new about the idea or this idea would completely fail incurrng huge costs to the company.

Knowing the past can sometimes have negative effect in making important decisions. Knowing that a particular thing didn't work or did work in the past can shape our today's decision. Thus, it may very well be the case that one can assume that it would happenly similary in the present times while the unexpected happens. This can be due to the difference in the miliue prevailing in the past and the present. For example, a tea kiosk is setup in a market during the summer where tea is not preffered the summer. The vendor might infer that people in the locality do not drink tea at all give the idea altogether. But, what if people prefer tea in the winter. The vendor is at loss because he wrongly infered from the past experience that tea wouldn't sell even in the winter.

Thus, we can see that having a knowledge on the past can greatly influence in making important decisions today. At the same time, there can be a few cases where knowing the past can have adverse effects on the decisions that one can take today.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... start only if had knowledge about what didnt work and what worked in the past. If th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...at worked in the past. If the scientist didnt know what had happened in the past, the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 832, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...in the past only to know that something doesnt work. It is this knowledge on the past ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...have knowledge of things that worked or didnt work in the past. In this rapidly evolv...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cesses that took place in the past. For a innovative technology company, where ti...
^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...isions. Knowing that a particular thing didnt work or did work in the past can shape ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is set up'?
Suggestion: is set up
...d the present. For example, a tea kiosk is setup in a market during the summer where tea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 716, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...oss because he wrongly infered from the past experience that tea wouldnt sell even in the winte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 741, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...fered from the past experience that tea wouldnt sell even in the winter. Thus, we ...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 30, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'knowledge'.
Suggestion: knowledge
...nter. Thus, we can see that having a knowledge on the past can greatly influence in ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2511.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56545454545 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46467203994 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0014678942 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5769230769 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157193566801 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605289998439 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055633528035 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116686661273 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049534393115 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.