communal online encyclopedias
The reading and the lecture are both about communal online encyclopedias. The author from the writing passage criticize these online information resources by mentioning three different issues. The lecturer from the listening passage, disagrees with these points made by the author and she points out the benefits of the online encyclopedias.
First of all, according to the writer, these online resources lack academic credibility since everyone from different educational backgrounds can input information. The professor, on the contrary, claims that the criticism made by the author is not fair and highly biased. She says that, the idea of these online resources has never been representing the truly accurate ones. She adds that, even the printed ones are also not completely accurate and fixing a wrong information from the published ones are unlikely while, within these online encyclopedias it is easy to correct the wrong information since it is online and easy to fix it.
Secondly, the writing passage mentions that hackers usually corrupt, delete and change the information. The professor, however, mentions that there are formats which specifically design to protect some crucial facts, therefore hacking these informations are not easy as the author mentions. She also adds that, special editors are working to eliminate hacking the system therefore these online resources are highly reliable.
Finally, the writer claims that these online information are usually about popular and trivial topics which creates wrong idea of the importance of topics. The lecturer, on the other hand, says that contrary to the traditional published papers academics are not deciding to which article and knowledge should be published, since there is no space problem to putting information into the internet. She continues by saying there are wide range of variety in terms of information regards that. She also mentions that this is the biggest strength of the communal online encyclopedias.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s by mentioning three different issues. The lecturer from the listening passage, di...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51465798046 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75873267064 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508143322476 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3439537218 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.928571429 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232591177572 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860719292801 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902695057418 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137768307489 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605083415278 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.