Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, however, is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one. As a result, the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users.
The passage indicates the benefits of traditional printed encyclopedia in comparison with the communal online encyclopedia which on the other hand is severely criticized by the professor in the lecture. there are three major problems indicated in the passage and a clever contrast with details are presented by the lecturer.
Firstly, it is stated that traditional encyclopedia is written by trained experts adhering to the standards of academic rigor whereas communal online encyclopedia lacks the academic credentials and inaccurate in many cases. this is contradicted in the lecture by implying that, in the former, if any mistakes occur then it can never be corrected, but in the latter, this can be done easily.
Secondly, even though the original data in communal encyclopedia could be right, there is a greater possibility for the hackers to change it. this is contrasted by saying that special editors are nominated to monitor malicious changes. Moreover, a user cannot predict changes by a hacker, the theory being refuted that formats cannot be changed.
Thirdly, traditional encyclopedias exclude unnecessary information wherein communal encyclopedias reflect all possible information’s on a topic. Nevertheless, the lecture specifies the limited space in the former in comparison to the latter in which online space is not an issue. Furthermore, it offers diverse range of topics to varied users.
Thus, the above points can be summed and stated that two theories are contrasted with specific details and information both in the passage and in the lecture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...icized by the professor in the lecture. there are three major problems indicated in t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...edentials and inaccurate in many cases. this is contradicted in the lecture by imply...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53278688525 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08881563837 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9815889355 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.727272727 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9090909091 7.06452816374 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232663605923 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07828817584 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772094000876 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118411986379 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04571158551 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.8541721854 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.7273730684 154% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.