Dinosaures
The reading and the lecture are both about were dinosaurs endotherms or not? The author of the reading believes that dinosaurs are endotherms because of several pieces of evidence. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that dinosaurs are not endotherms.
First of all, the author points out that the dinosaurs were endotherm because they were discovered in polar regions. The article notes that only animals that can sustain their temperature in polar regions could live in such cold weathers. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that dinosaurs may migrate or hibernate in such a cold climate. Furthermore, she states that by migrating or hibernating dinosaurs are not considered endotherms.
Secondly, the author contends that there is a connection among endothermy and the placement of and the movement of the legs. She/he asserts that endothermy enable dinosaurs to maintain their physical activity like running, and running would not be effective if the legs are not positioned under the body. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that the placement of the legs underneath dinosaurs is for holding more weight not for running because of the large size of their bodies.
Finally, the author emphasizes that there is a connection among endothermy and bone structure. She/he states that structures called Haversian canals are usually the bones of endotherms. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that dinosaurs did not grow rapidly when the climate is cold. She puts forth the idea that Haversian canals enable any animal that has this feature to grow hastily even though the climate is cold or worm, which did not happen to dinosaurs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... because of several pieces of evidence. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60448533022 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9909365736 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332454422112 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125483628024 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127214727008 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223316941346 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103657104878 0.0443174109184 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.