The lecture was about Reoenomamus robustus(R. robysus). In which it argues about whether they were hunter or not.
Firstly arguer said that size of R, robustus was small. Lecturer argues that small size dones not mean they are not hunter. Even small size mammal can be an hunter.
Second reason was size of the legs. It said that because of the small legs R. robustus appear much more suited for scavenging than hunting. Lecturer disgree this by giving an example of another animal with samll legs, which can achive high speed with his small legs.
In last paragraph it says that R.robustus provide no evidence to support the idea that the dinosaur had been actively hunted. Bones of psittacosaur inside the R. robustus do not have teeth marks. Lecturer argues thism she said absense of teeth mark does not show they are not hunter. It may possible tahat they eat in big pices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as about Reoenomamus robustus R. robysus . In which it argues about whether they w...
^^
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t hunter. Even small size mammal can be an hunter. Second reason was size of the ...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an example of another animal with samll legs, which can achive high speed with h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 1373.03311258 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 154.0 270.72406181 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11520436131 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649350649351 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 419.366225166 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 31.8827016839 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 51.8571428571 110.228320801 47% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.0 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 7.06452816374 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0459749760472 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129068831252 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482931345858 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0260834063682 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451777850641 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.3589403974 47% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.23 53.8541721854 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 11.0289183223 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.85 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 63.6247240618 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.