I strongly agree with the authors view. There are so many reasons which explains that how technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Technology makes children lazy. Creativity and innovations comes from the world. Technology provides the knowledge but it also has some limitations. Technology is one of the human creativity but that does not mean it makes other creative.
Children in earlier days were more active in physical activities, like playing outdoor games. Physical activities make there mind more creative. For example, there is huge difference between playing cricket game on computer or in mobile and playing it on ground.
Secondly they do not get in touch with there friends physically. With use of technology it may becomes easy to get in touch with others but they do not get involved in any gathering. Meeting people and sharing each others view make human more creative.
Children now a days thinks that they can do anything with use of technology. In past days children play cricket or many outdoor games physically on ground during vacation but technology has changed there way to enjoy the vacations. They becomes lazy.
In conclusion I say that technology makes them less creative by not allowing them in being part of physical activities and also they do not get involved in many activities and gatherings so that they can meet others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...w make human more creative. Children now a days thinks that they can do anything with u...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ke human more creative. Children now a days thinks that they can do anything with u...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
... there way to enjoy the vacations. They becomes lazy. In conclusion I say that tec...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enjoy the vacations. They becomes lazy. In conclusion I say that technology make...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 231.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06060606061 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59702017387 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 212.727598566 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0458968722 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0625 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4375 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340685839525 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110502237844 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123737235133 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185362898091 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15253577695 0.0645574589148 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.