dinosaurs are endothermal or not
The article is about the endotherm animals, which maintain their body temperature constant irrespective of environment temperature. In the article, the author states that all the dinosaurs earlier were endotherm. However, the professor disagrees and claims that this is not true and she explained every point made by the author.
To begin with, the author stated that their dinosaur fossil has been discovered in the polar region and only animals who are capable of maintaining temperature can live there. The professor disagrees with his opinion and states that there are possibilities that fossils are found in the polar region but that long ago those polar areas were warmer, and no endotherm lived there, and when the winter hits there dinosaurs could have migrated to a warmer area.
To carry on the author states that endotherm has leg underneath the body and so do dinosaurs. The professor sees flaws in this and states that, yes, it is true that dinosaurs have underneath legs but they have a different purpose here, that is for support. As dinosaurs have a large body and to support that cumbersome wait legs were underneath the body.
Another point made by the author is that the Haversian canal is another characteristic point of endotherm. In this, the professor states that yes they have a Haversian canal but in parallel to this they also have a growth ring and that gives the true evidence of their non-endothermal character. While analyzing the growth ring of dinosaurs it was found that it does not grow during winter whereas the other endotherm's growth ring changes as per season to maintain temperature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'endotherms'' or 'endotherm's'?
Suggestion: endotherms'; endotherm's
...ot grow during winter whereas the other endotherms growth ring changes as per season to ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, while, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05185185185 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66805519405 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1347257766 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319510654987 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136913914639 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914358279727 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212086916305 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031225148711 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.