dinosaurs have capability of endothermic or not.
Author discusses the possibility about dinosaurs have capability of endothermic or not. To prove this, author provides various evidence to support this characteristic of dinosaurs. On the other hand, lecturer contradicts these evidence by mentioning the research methods and scientific study.
The first reason, author states that dinosaurs were endothermic, was endothermic characteristic of dinosaurs help them to maintain a temperature well above that of surrounding environment. However, lecturer contradict this statement by explaining that dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer place and didn't stay in the colder climates at Polar Regions.
Second reason was explaining the connection between endothermic and leg position and movement. This legs position and movement also matches with the dinosaurs. But the lecture suggests that this leg position helps dinosaurs to support more weight as being large is at advantage for them.
Thirdly, by describing the connection between endothermic and bone structure, author believes that endothermic bone structure have Haversian canals. Also, the dinosaurs have this Haversian canals inside their bone structure. The lecturer do support this theory that dinosaurs contain more Haversian canals but this also suggests that it is related to growth rings. These growth rings stopped growing during colder weather and again it grows in warmer weather. This growing, slowing, and again growing rings does not support in endothermic animals.
In the end, lecturer contradicts all the three major reasons explained the paragraph and deny the possibility that dinosaurs have endothermic capability, which is maintaining body temperature at constant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...could have migrated to warmer place and didnt stay in the colder climates at Polar Re...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thirdly, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90688259109 5.08290768461 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89085836263 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558704453441 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7162426155 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.214285714 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327506040422 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123437043228 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154696329721 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185423267549 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661096911561 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 12.2367328918 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.