Directions: Summarize the main points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage.
Racial profiling is the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offence. While
there are many definitions to racial profiling, most are similar in that they identify that some type of police action is being that relies on the national origin, race, or ethnicity of a person, rather than the actual behavior of the person in some manner of criminal activity.
Many argue that this is a biased form of policing since police officers tend to stop, question, arrest, or search someone
based on his or her ethnicity or race. They also cry against the use of race or ethnicity as a factor when reacting with
suspicion and action against an individual.
The racial profiling debate, however, seems to center on whether or not the practice is really all that bad. Some in the
realm of law enforcement argue that the practice is necessary and effective. They believe that due to demographic and
socio-economic factors and their relation to crime, those in a large minority population have a higher risk of participating
in criminal activities. They argue that ignoring the facts due to moral integrity is professionally and morally wrong. If law
enforcement officers are to identify and take action against violators, any information to assist them in being more
effective is crucial. Critics of racial profiling argue that individual rights are violated when this practice is utilized. Civil
liberties organizations intimate that this type of profiling is in fact a form of discrimination and undermines basic human
rights and freedoms. Researchers are interested in collecting data and analyzing trends to see how this information
corresponds to perceptions of racial profiling and the effects it has on ethnic groups.
In comparison to the lecture, the reading passage focuses on the Racial profiling issue as
punishing someone of having done a illegal act, the professor mentions that under the system,
someone is punished based on the race, colour, and ethnicity.
The firstly, the professor says that the in the present day has changed in comparison to what happened 40 years
ago and also the prisoner's numbers in the american jail is burgeoned. In addition to that, the majority of
the prisoners are African American, due to their black colour, race, and poor wealth. However, the reading text says that, one is punished based on his misdeed in the Racial profiling.
Secondly, The reading passage present that this practice of the Racial profiling is necessary and effective . Nevertheless, the professor says that it is not at all beneficial to us. Refuting the points of reading passage, the professor provides an example of the number of prisoner has changed from 300000 on 1972 to 2.3 million today. Whats more, he added that this number also will increase further and united state will be the highest number of prisoner in the jail very soon.
Finally, The professor points out that the law has be changed in the present day. In addition to that, he adds that the rich men and culprit are not culpable in this law, whereas the innocent and poors are culpable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ue as punishing someone of having done a illegal act, the professor mentions tha...
^
Line 6, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prisoners'' or 'prisoner's'?
Suggestion: prisoners'; prisoner's
...hat happened 40 years ago and also the prisoners numbers in the american jail is burgeon...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ial profiling is necessary and effective . Nevertheless, the professor says that i...
^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...om 300000 on 1972 to 2.3 million today. Whats more, he added that this number also wi...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 52, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e professor points out that the law has be changed in the present day. In addition...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91774891775 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47718483539 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4344009775 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.09492273731 195% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914557674297 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375092227509 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404113370207 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0338405423511 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349166409131 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.