Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Under restriction and norms, no-system can move freely and its rate of development reduces. If the scientific research are taken under goverment restriction, then the pogress of scientific research will be hindered due to maintain the government prcedure. However, minor restriction is necessary and good but when the restruction become very stringent that throttles the scientific development. Therefore, this is very sensitive issue, the restriction has pros and cons and I believe governmental restriction is necessary for scientific research for some situation but not always.
Any research should be free of any constrain because under restriction that can't develop to all direction, its will be oriented to certain direction and it will not spontanious. During research the researcher thinks and analyzes all the possible ways to successful outcome, if his plans are blocked by restriction that will not only hinder the overall process but also demotivate the researcher. Additionaly the restriction will create another big problem - the checking process for the approval of any research will be time consuming to start research. Therefore, the government restriction on the scientific research will hinder the research work.
Many new and unconventional subject research will not get permition due to absence of any previous innocuous safety history. So new area of scientific research will be thwarted and further new development will stop. In the situation countries research institute and student will be in big trouble because they will not get funding and approval for new research.
It is ture that the government restriction will create many problems for general scientific development but protection of our society and country is necessary from dengerious effect of some illegal research out-comes. If some unconsionable scientiest work on a radio-active element, if the system/ container is not protected enough then that may cause massive disaster in the near locality. The goverment restriction will play a crucial role: all the instrument, system and final outcome of any research project will be invistigated before approval and that reduces the chances of such dishevel. Further, some research related on very unethical and objectionalble matter like- apply new drag on human specimen. This type of research is very sensible issue and should be control by government for better judgement.
However, some govermen restriction is necessary to control the restricted and dengerious reserch works but if the restriction is to strict that will create unnecessary problem and hinder good research. A strict restriction will hamper normal research process and many unconventional research work will not get approval. First of all, we require the government restriction to stymie the dengeriour research and pogress the desireble research work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...fic research for some situation but not always. Any research should be free of any ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...onstrain because under restriction that cant develop to all direction, its will be o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ion that cant develop to all direction, its will be oriented to certain direction a...
^^^
Line 7, column 771, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'controlled'?
Suggestion: controlled
...ch is very sensible issue and should be control by government for better judgement. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much unconventional research', 'a good deal of unconventional research'.
Suggestion: much unconventional research; a good deal of unconventional research
...will hamper normal research process and many unconventional research work will not get approval. First of al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 37.0 12.9106741573 287% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61520737327 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0244732161 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470046082949 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8991005397 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.263157895 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143813068077 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669790212843 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382485956065 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103964837243 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301634035871 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.