The author in the reading mentions several benefits of the driverless car in the market; in contrast, the lecturer disagrees and has a different opinion: there are several problems in the author's argument when taken into account cast doubts on the mentioned advantages.
First, the author states that driverless cars are safer because human errors are the major concern for crashes in the US. The software on which they run is more reliable and hence safer. The lecturer says that there is a problem with this argument by explaining that the software made for these driverless cars is itself made by humans; therefore, there is still a probability of human error happening in this. Moreover, a recent accident has been in the news due to a fault in a driverless car.
Second, the author claims that these cars can communicate with other cars through their software which makes them more efficient on roads by starting and stopping their engines less often; however, the professor refutes this claim. When a human is not driving a car, age will no longer be a criterion to travel in this autonomous car, and as a result, more people will be driving the car and pollution will increase no matter how efficient the car is.
Finally, the author asserts that these cars can save the time people spend driving. Once again, the lecturer disagrees. She contends that people find listening to music while driving a relaxing experience. So, if we take away this experience from them, they will find one more place to work, which they don't want.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nion: there are several problems in the authors argument when taken into account cast d...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...find one more place to work, which they dont want.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87072243346 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44168050698 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2717646999 49.2860985944 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.454545455 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384437243712 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138825427207 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120636447848 0.0662205650399 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213807490748 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108933243118 0.0443174109184 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.