eco- toruism?
The article states eco-tourism, or the green tourists, i is entirely a good thing, and provides tree reason of support. However, the professor states all the news have positive, and negative impact. She refuses each point, and explains them.
Firstly, the reading claims that eco tourism serves as a substitute for the development that would be more dangerous. However, the professor refutes this point by saying, in eco tourism you exhibit your natural resources, such as forests, but to keep the tourist satisfied, and comfortable you will provide them an accommodation, by building infrastures. Thus this is also a big damage for the environment.
Secondly, the reading posists that since those ares attract the tourist to keep their attention on them the government will protect them. The professor says, this is not certain. People might do illegal cutting trees, and hunting. There is no quarantee people will not exploit that area.
Third, the author says, from eco-tourism the local people will also, get benefit. However, the professor opposes this point by saying there are more jobs than past, local people will have the less wage. Additionally, we learn that governments can use some of the funds to protect the environment. This is the party all of the sites get mutual benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... refuses each point, and explains them. Firstly, the reading claims that eco tou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...accommodation, by building infrastures. Thus this is also a big damage for the envir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'big damage'.
Suggestion: big damage
...building infrastures. Thus this is also a big damage for the environment. Secondly, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also a big damage for the environment. Secondly, the reading posists that sinc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mage for the environment. Secondly, the reading posists that since those are...
^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntee people will not exploit that area. Third, the author says, from eco-tourism...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve the less wage. Additionally, we learn that governments can use some of the fun...
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lly, we learn that governments can use some of the funds to protect the environment. This ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tect the environment. This is the party all of the sites get mutual benefit.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thus, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16587677725 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65245383216 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625592417062 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1359233129 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8571428571 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0714285714 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963749922754 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308672684988 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497328789408 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605064251991 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403181065289 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.