the effect of agriculture on the population of birds
The text and the lecture both discuss the population of birds and how human activities like agriculture can affect their population. The text claims that because of the human activities and agriculture, the population of birds has decreased and provides three reasons of support. On the other hand, the professor refutes all stated claims and states her own opinion.
First, The text explains that as the the result of the growth of human population and settelments, the number of birds has decreased. It states that by increasing buildings and malls, there will be less habitat for birds, and it decreases their population. The professor goes against this point. She states that however, the population of some spicies has decreased, but that the growth of human population has created better and larger habitats for other birds, and the proof of this claims is the number of different birds such as falkon which can be seen in cities.
Second, the text claims that as the egricultural activities increase, more habitats of birds are destructed, and as its result the number of birds decreases. The professor refutes this point, and says that we may assume that agriculture may destroy some habitats of birds, but it is not like this in the United States. She points that by the increase of productivity of crops the need of more lands for agriculture is declined, and it shows that agriculture do not have a negative effect on the habitats of birds and their population.
Third, the text states that chemical pesticides can easily enter to the food and water chain of animals like birds, and it can kill them or ceases them from reproducing. The text also states that by increase in the demand of pesticides, the number of birds which will be killed increases too. The professor rejects this point, and says that we can not predict the effects of pesticides. She states that people now are more aware of the effects of pesticides on environment, and as the result, they will decrease the use of this chemicals. She also states that by using new and less toxic pesticides we can decrease their harmful effects, and also there is a trend in pesticides production which produce more specialized pesticides, and because birds are not interested in these chemicals will not eat them like the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...on. First, The text explains that as the the result of the growth of human populatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...on. First, The text explains that as the the result of the growth of human populatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...itats for other birds, and the proof of this claims is the number of different birds...
^^^^
Line 7, column 524, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e result, they will decrease the use of this chemicals. She also states that by usin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 7.30242825607 329% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 390.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90769230769 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62341151336 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415384615385 0.540411800872 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 12.0 1.51434878587 792% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6196987111 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280115630727 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101769106881 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908673738948 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186122722543 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679369824721 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.