the effectiveness of internal combustion over the fuel-cell engine in automobiles.
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not Fuel-cell engines effective over internal combustion engine in automobiles. While the reading states that hydrogen-based engine works better than fuel engine, the professor refutes this, saying that although fuel-cell engines work better, this is not the solution and it is optimistic.
First of all, the reading claims that fuel-cell machine work with hydrogen and it is plentiful in nature and numerous sources. The professor argues that even though a variety of sources practically not easily obtain. Furthermore, the lecture states that it requires pure liquid hydrogen and it must require the laboratory prepare and store because it should preserve extreme cold temperature; approximately two hundred degree Celsius.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that Hydrogen machine less harm to the environment it releases fewer pollutants. The lecture counters this point by stating it is not a solution for environmental pollution. According to the professor, pure hydrogen getting from water requires a lot of chemical procedures and should burn huge coal; which releases a lot of pollution into the air.
Lastly, the reading passage posits that fuel-cell engine economically benefits over fuel engine. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that hydrogen engine is expensive it costs more money to design because should be made up of platinum components for chemical reactions to release energy and it is expensive material.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not Fuel-cell engines effective over intern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50649350649 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78031293021 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580086580087 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4743625507 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30576379228 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133695291605 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.212789000093 0.0662205650399 321% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188036900461 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194810553176 0.0443174109184 440% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.