electronic devices
The reading and the lecture both have conflicting opinions about whether or not electronic devices are good for health. The reading passage strongly postulates that there are many side effects of electronic devices. On the other hand, the listening delineates that the claims made by the author in the reading passage are not true.
First, according to the author of the excerpt, people's critical thinking has been effecting by electronic screens and it often stops individuals from caring about the source of information. Nonetheless, the lecturer offsets these points by declaring that paper materials weigh limits than electronic devices. She says that information from paper materials are limited, which can lead to biased thoughts. Also, paper materials offer different perspectives.
Second, the writer contends that electronic devices can be detrimental to human being’s health and it can lead to more serious health problems. The lecturer, however, dissents this claim by mentioning that these devices can not harm people if they take breaks in between. In fact, issues like eye problems, headaches, and neck pain can also be caused by paper materials. By taking frequent breaks as well as stretching the body, one cannot affect himself. It is just a matter of body habits.
The article lastly points out that electrical devices can cause addiction, which can hinder communication between individuals. In contrast, the speaker in the listening counters these indications by insisting that electronic devices can actually improve people's social skills by increasing their convenience and become familiar with the wide variety of topics on the internet. Additionally, people can share their thoughts with other people. Thereby, the professor precisely disapproves of the key points in the reading.
In conclusion, while the reading passage discusses the side effects of electronic devices, the lecturer opposes each of the claims by using reasons and evidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | shekoo20 | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | mraru | 83 | view |
- TPO 39 EXTINCTION 80
- SEA OTTERS TPO 10 80
- TPO 50 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 70
- TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Living today is more comfortable and easier than when your grandparents were children 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...re both have conflicting opinions about whether or not electronic devices are good for health....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, lastly, nonetheless, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53795379538 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75254647675 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4638004485 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7058823529 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287995359092 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810980558052 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895911908651 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156956371116 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506948869525 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.