elephant and their behavior as a smart animals
The article states that elephants are able to behave surprisingly, which makes them as interesting animals for humans. The author of the reading provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that there are some misunderstanding about the elephants behaviors and refutes the author's reasons.
First, the reading explains that elephants are conscious about their death and support it by the fact that elephants moving out of their places in the end of their lives. However, this explanation are challenged by the professor. He mentions that elephants are not aware of their death or its time. According to the professor, most old elephants at the end of their life are not able to eat properly and because of that, they should find some softer vegetables which are abundant near water, and therefore they have to leave their places in order to find proper vegetables.
Second, the article posits that elephants have artistic ability by which they are able to recognize some artistic things like drawing of flowers or other elephants including themselves. The professor rejects this point by saying that elephants are sensitive animals which have the ability of learning some tricks including the movement of brush. Also, the professor states that elephants just encourage to draw and it is not enough to saying that they are able to recognize paintings.
Third, the author of the article mentions that elephants fear of mice and small mammals which are not a threat for them. The professor on the other hand, refutes this claim. He explains that elephants fear of mice because to them mice are a strange animals which are not familiar for. He puts forth the reason that if elephants be familiar with such small animals they will not classify them as dangerous animals and they will not afraid of.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'say'?
Suggestion: say
...courage to draw and it is not enough to saying that they are able to recognize paintin...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'animal'?
Suggestion: animal
...mice because to them mice are a strange animals which are not familiar for. He puts for...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04983388704 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51826365938 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461794019934 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2896094637 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320670940555 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110806735051 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774637432853 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190121198134 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436365303814 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.