Both the reading and the listening are talking about a mass-extinction event at the end of the Triassic period 200 million ago. The reading suggests that the Triassic period allows the dinosaurs dominate for the next 145 million years. And the lecturer opposites what the passage claims.
The author of the reading thinks that the cause of the mass-extinction is the decline of sea level which involves with changing of food chain due to low population on sea. The lecturer refutes what the passage claims while she believes that while changing the level of sea takes time, the species are able to adapt. Furthermore, she remarks to have effect, faster change is required.
The text suggests the effect of widespread volcanic activity due to lots of SO2 in atmosphere. Because the SO2 could lower the global temperatures, many species can reach to the extensions. However, the professor utters that the effects of SO2 which is cooling global temperature is short period so that it can cause extinction of the species. In addition, lecturer explained the feature of SO2 as well; if SO2 combines with H20, it raises the temperature of the earth again.
The third explanation that the passage adduces is about the asteroids. The asteroids which can block the sun makes the temperature of the area cooler. long sufficient to make plants die. Death of the plant will make the other animal species to suffer. The speaker of the listening doubt the accuracy of the theory. She does not understand where the asteroids come from and it happened long time before of the extinction which means between the event and extinction the species are able to do anything to survive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Long
...kes the temperature of the area cooler. long sufficient to make plants die. Death of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to suffer. The speaker of the listening doubt the accuracy of the theory. She do...
^^
Line 7, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies are able to do anything to survive.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, well, while, in addition, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96797153025 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62670097454 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526690391459 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0747642811 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.25 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244726169175 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677868445611 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106275904612 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154345678545 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129777495539 0.0443174109184 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.