Endangered species
The reading claims that the idea of safeguarding the endangered species from being extinct is illogical and has many limitations and provides three reason in support of it’s claim. However, the professor believes that we should prevent the endangered species from being extinction and refutes each of author’s reasons.
First, the article states that the extinction of any species does not have any impact on the balance of ecosystem. However, the lecturer rejects this claim by discussing the author’s example of dinosaur. He states that the extinction of dinosaur causes dramatic shift in the ecosystem. He then explains that since we are dominating the world, we should take appropriate measure to safe the current ecosystem that support us.
Second, the reading claims that we are not dependent on nature for medication because of Genetic Engineering. The lecturer opposes this argument by saying that still nature plays a vital role in producing medicine. Though new invention helps us to produce new medicine, yet the extinction of one species reduces the possibility of inventing new medicine.
Finally, the author argues that the expenditure of preserving the endangered species is not justified. However, the lecturer rejects this claim by giving one example of Freshwater Mussels of North America. This species are considered as endangered species and almost forty percent of this species have already became extinct. But the remaining species of Freshwater mussels provide the basis for setting up an industry, which creates ten thousand jobs. According the professor, these endangered species along with other species deserve to be saved only for economic reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refutes each of author's reasons. First, the article states that the extin...
^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ital role in producing medicine. Though new invention helps us to produce new medicine, yet t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ty percent of this species have already became extinct. But the remaining species of F...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50957854406 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76751439911 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9874458274 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391435407681 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145552671124 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16529436586 0.0662205650399 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229712778669 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191340301028 0.0443174109184 432% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.