In a study of reading habits of Leeville citizens conducted by the University of Leeville, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in Leeville was the mystery novel. Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits.
The argument is related to two survey conducted by the University of Leevile and the arguer concluded that the first study is significantly flawed. The author mentioned that in the first survey, the researchers found that most of the inhabitants of Leevile preferred to read literary classics and the second survey concluded that as the type of book most frequently checked out of each public library in Leevile was mystery novel, therefore the people of Leevile like to read mystery novel and that's why the writer concluded that the first survey was critically flawed. However, the author’s argument is not convincing to me because the conclusion of the writer is based on some incorrect assumptions. In the following few paragraphs, I will discuss why the authors conclusion is not convincing to me.
Firstly, the author mentioned two survey which conducted by University of Leevile, but he/she did not elaborate the two surveys, like when the survey conducted, who were the target group etc. Without having detail information about the two survey, we can not conclude that first survey had misrepresented the reading habit of the people of Leevile. It might happen that the group who answered the first survey and the people who answered the second survey are totally different. And that's why the findings of two survey are different and we can not comment that the first survey was flawed.
Secondly, it can be also the case that the rich people in Leevile had the habit of reading literray classics and they usually bought these books rather than going to public library. These people buy the classical books and preserve in their home library. They don't like to go to public library as well as they have no enough time to public library for reading and this resulted into less checked out of literary classics in the register of public library. On the other hand, the students might have the inclination for reading mystery novel. As they are students, they have no enough money to buy books, so they go to library and borrow mystery novel. And this results into frequently checked out of mystery novel in the register of public library.
Thirdly, in the above statements the author did not mention about any details of two survey. May be the target group of two independent survey were different and these two different groups have different reading habits. This might result into different findings. So, without knowing details about the two survey, it is totally absurd to claim that the first survey had misrepresented the reading habit of Leevile. We also aware that taste is a continuous process and it changes over time. If there is significant time gap between conducting these two surveys, then with the time being it is also understandable that the taste of reading had also changed.
Finally, without knowing details about the two survey, we can not conclude one survey is erroneous and the other is right. The writers here made the same mistakes by claiming the first survey misrepresented the reading of the people of Leevile only based on the two different findings of two surveys. The authors did not mention any other information about these two distinct surveys. That's why the author’s claim is unconvincing and flawed.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 547 350
No. of Characters: 2654 1500
No. of Different Words: 204 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.836 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.852 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.488 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 202 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 142 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.783 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.392 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.783 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.539 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.164 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'survey' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'surveys'.
Suggestion: surveys
The argument is related to two survey conducted by the University of Leevile ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... Leevile like to read mystery novel and thats why the writer concluded that the first...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 764, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... few paragraphs, I will discuss why the authors conclusion is not convincing to me. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'survey' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'surveys'.
Suggestion: surveys
...e. Firstly, the author mentioned two survey which conducted by University of Leevil...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...econd survey are totally different. And thats why the findings of two survey are diff...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'survey' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'surveys'.
Suggestion: surveys
...rent. And thats why the findings of two survey are different and we can not comment th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment that the first survey was flawed. Secondly, it can be also the case that t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd preserve in their home library. They dont like to go to public library as well as...
^^^^
Line 5, column 750, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovel in the register of public library. Thirdly, in the above statements the aut...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'survey' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'surveys'.
Suggestion: surveys
...id not mention about any details of two survey. May be the target group of two indepen...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...on about any details of two survey. May be the target group of two independent sur...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'survey' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'surveys'.
Suggestion: surveys
... be the target group of two independent survey were different and these two different ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ation about these two distinct surveys. Thats why the author's claim is unconvin...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pos;s claim is unconvincing and flawed.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2724.0 2260.96107784 120% => OK
No of words: 545.0 441.139720559 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99816513761 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5837142831 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.376146788991 0.468620217663 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 840.6 705.55239521 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.018726194 57.8364921388 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7083333333 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.25449101796 266% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159923605528 0.218282227539 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465081599804 0.0743258471296 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469364246764 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920808649396 0.128457276422 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574956273673 0.0628817314937 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.