Essay topics: A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature—novels, plays, and poems—than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and for the future of literature itself.
While there has been a decline in book reading generally, the decline has been especially sharp for literature. This is unfortunate because nothing else provides the intellectual stimulation that literature does. Literature encourages us to exercise our imaginations, empathize with others, and expand our understanding of language. So by reading less literature, the reading public is missing out on important benefits.
Unfortunately, missing out on the benefits of literature is not the only problem. What are people reading instead? Consider the prevalence of self-help books on lists of best sellers. These are usually superficial poorly written, and intellectually undemanding. Additionally, instead of sitting down with a challenging novel, many persons are now more likely to turn on the television, watch a music video, or read a Web page. Clearly, diverting time previously spent in reading literature to trivial forms of entertainment has lowered the level of culture in general.
The trend of reading less literature is all the more regrettable because it is taking place during a period when good literature is being written. There are many talented writers today, but they lack an audience. This fact is bound to lead publishers to invest less in literature and so support fewer serious writers. Thus, the writing as well as the reading of literature is likely to decline because of the poor standards of today's readers.
The article and the lecture are both about reading and writing of literature The outher of reading feels that these days people are reading literature more less.The lectuurer challenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer thinks that accoding to new culture people are used the literature.
First of all, the author argues that literature is expand understanding of languge. The article is mentioned that reading less literature the reading public is missing that important benifits. This point is clhallenged by the lecturer. He claims that reading other varities bookssuch as histry, sciences also give ability to understanding language and good knowlege about the language. Furthermore,he says that ti stimulate the high quality of languag.
Secondly, the author suggests that many people move to watch television, listern to redio, watch vedio or spent time in web page. The article notes that these days entertainment become main in culture rather than prefer the literature. The lecturer is rebuts this argument. He suggests that new culture is watching television and go throught internet. He elaborates on this by mentioning that it help to improve literature knowlege in new way.
Finally, the author states that lack of tallented wrtiers in today. Moreover, he says writing as the reading of literature in poor standards in today. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that writers who write literature, they use dificult languge to understand the reader. He notes that most of the readers dificult to understand the words in literature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...hese days people are reading literature more less.The lectuurer challenges the claims mad...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...people are reading literature more less.The lectuurer challenges the claims made by...
^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...allenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer thinks that accoding to new cu...
^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'expanded'.
Suggestion: expanded
...l, the author argues that literature is expand understanding of languge. The article i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g that important benifits. This point is clhallenged by the lecturer. He claims t...
^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve ability to understanding language and good knowlege about the language. Furthe...
^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , he
...knowlege about the language. Furthermore,he says that ti stimulate the high quality...
^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stimulate the high quality of languag. Secondly, the author suggests that many ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
... web page. The article notes that these days entertainment become main in culture ra...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39024390244 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79027659313 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540650406504 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3770279751 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.875 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202355161627 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632441633064 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618547315216 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129438365461 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652707813818 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.