ethanol and gasoline
Both the passage and the lecture discuss the matter of substitute gasoline with ethanol for fuel. The passage states that this substitution is not proper and explain three reason for this claim. In the opposite the professor make doubt on this claim by stating that such a replacement is conceivable and denies each reason explaining in passage.
First, the reading talk about the effect of ethanol on global warming. In fact, it states that the ethanol release carbon dioxide which is one of the greenhouse gases. The professor refutes this by stating that ethanol is made by plants which help reducing of carbon dioxide in our environment. So, in his opinion, by considering this it is not true to said ethanol fuel will increase global warming.
Second, according to reading usage of ethanol fuel cause declining in the amount of plants on which animals are fed. The professor disagrees with this claim again. He states that the ethanol is made from those parts of plants which are not the foods of animals. So, ethanol can affect the animals feeding at all.
Third, reading says that the real price of ethanol, without considering the tax subsidies paid by government, is very higher than gasoline and has not any chance to compete with. In contrast, the professor states that by increasing the costumers of ethanol, the ethanol manufacturer can drop the price of ethanol in the way that it can compete with gasoline in terms of price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...at ethanol is made by plants which help reducing of carbon dioxide in our environment. S...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, third, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89795918367 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47316627765 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502040816327 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0859880572 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3076923077 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385388547727 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143592285652 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115651490098 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233018818951 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103618315326 0.0443174109184 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.