The reading was about the disadvantages of ethanol as an alternative of gasoline, but the lecture cast doubt on the article by giving some specific reasons.
The reading states, as a gasoline ethanol also release carbon oxide in to the atmosphere, in the result ethanol will not have any environmental advantage over gasoline. However, the professor says that ethanol will not add to the global warming because corn plants will observe carbon oxide from air and it will remove the carbon oxide.
The article adds that the production of huge ethanol will reduce the amount of foods of animals such as cow. Nevertheless, the professor talks that ethanol will not reduce the food of animals because that part of the corn which made ethanol are not eaten by animal, so it will not decrease food of animals.
The reading states that the ethanol will never compete with gasoline if the United State stop helping producers. In contrast, the professor adds that the ethanol can compete with gasoline. Whenever more people buy this, the product will increase, therefore the price will drop.
In conclusion, the professor denies the points made in the article about ethanol by giving specific reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0404040404 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47410834872 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5108986371 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.888888889 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216735184949 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999050961675 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379154980557 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126727166678 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196878451656 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.