Hshshdh
QUESTION 1 In this set of materials, the reading claims that the companies should offer four days work to their employees, which provides benefits for whole economy, companies as well as individual employees. However, in the lecture, the professor casted doubt on what is presented in the text and refused every of the reasons given in the reading. First, it is clearly stated in the reading that the company profits will effectively increase as employees perform better in their work thanks to more resting time. However, the professor disagrees with this idea. He explains from another angle that more employees leads to more costs for the companies, because they need to spend more time on training and medical. Furthermore, more office spaces and computers have to be provided for the additional number of employees, which also furthers the costs. Considering these aspects, the more number of employees not only help the companies but also harm their economic. In addition, the professor disagrees with the point that four-day workweek decreases unemployment rate. He point out that the significant rate of unemployment cannot be compensated by a less number of jobs. Moreover, the four-day workweek policy will not provide new jobs because the companies may force employees to do the works of five days within four days. This can result in more pressure on employees. Finally, although it is mentioned in the reading that the life quality of employees will be raised as they have more free time, the professor provides some evidences to oppose this point of view. He states that less number of working hours leads to instability in job situation. In particular, the employees with four-day workweek have to face the risk of losing their job. This situation may encourage them to prefer five-day workweek instead of accepting the risk of unemployment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1074, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...orkweek decreases unemployment rate. He point out that the significant rate of unempl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, in addition, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12871287129 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67242377597 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7823838028 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.