extinction of giant Steller's sea cow
Both the lecture and the reading discuss extinction of giant Steller's sea cow, an enormous marine mammal. The author of extract provides three theories explained the cause of such a huge extinction. In contrast, the professor in the lecture firmly denies all of the author's reasons by giving some declarations.
First and foremost, according to the passage, native Siberian haunter are on of the candidate for the above-mentioned surmise. The reason bringing such a thought is that these specific animals were a reliable source of food in harsh environmental condition. The speaker in the lecture offset this hypothesis by referring to the population of native Siberian people and the number and size of those animals before extinction. He asserts that Siberia's population was not as big to haunt such a great population of steller's sea cows, especially by considering their huge size those people if needed to haunt them, a small number of these animals were enough for them.
The professor in the lecture maintains that if there had been an ecosystems' disturbance that caused kelp shortage, it would have diminished other marine animals' foods sources. He justifies his assertion by mentioning that any another demise did not report until now.
The text lasting insists that European fur traders could cause this extinction. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture counters this indication by asserting that the extinction occurred soon after the European arrival in the Island. He explains that decrease of these animals had been started long before their arrival, so they could not be the main cause o the sea cow's demise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... professor in the lecture firmly denies all of the authors reasons by giving some declarat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 611, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...e those people if needed to haunt them, a small number of these animals were enough for them. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ecosystems'' or 'ecosystem's'?
Suggestion: ecosystems'; ecosystem's
...ure maintains that if there had been an ecosystems disturbance that caused kelp shortage, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22053231939 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75020880212 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58174904943 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3080054186 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.416666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147821843897 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541858678242 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114163528294 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922570211319 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848838406639 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.