The food industry has been overusing hard-to-recycle plastic packaging. However, it has caused severe environmental issues. As a solution to the plastic packaging crisis, casein-based plastic packages, which are made out of milk proteins, have recently been invented. The edible milk-based packaging promises to have advantages in general.
First of all, using casein would reduce a large amount of waste. Casein-based wraps are biodegradable, which means they can easily dissolve in water. The good news is, they hardly have any impact on the maritime environment. This is because casein is a chief protein in milk, and protein does not do any harm to the environment when disposed of. Significant drops in landfills can be expected.
Second, food can stay fresher when using casein-based plastic packages. Casein is much more effective in blocking oxygen due to its pores, which are smaller than those of other kinds of plastic materials. Since casein-based films possess strength and low oxygen permeability, they become more effective in preventing food spoilage during distribution processes.
Third, casein-based plastic bags can be nutritious. While many other edible plastic packages are made out of starch, casein contains a high number of proteins and other edible substances such as hydroxyl and amino groups, which are good for producing enzymes, hormones and other bodily chemicals. These are also very nutritious for our bones and muscles. Other nutrients, such as vitamins or probiotics, can be added for more health benefits.
In the given set of materials, the reading passage discuss several benefits of utilizing milk casing to combat environmental hazards from plastic usage. Based on the arguments of decreased amount of wastage, longer duration of freshness, and nutrition benefits, the author illustrates several usefulness of casein packaging. However, the speaker refutes the author's beliefs mentioning that the illustrated points aren't convincing.
First, the author mentions that casein is biodegradable and water-soluble, would reduce the total amount of wastage in the environment. However, the professor points out that increased affinity to water and heat intolerance may need extra packaging, thereby increasing the utilization of synthetic packages.
Notwithstanding with the previous point, the author next mentions that casein packaged food can stay fresh for longer duration of time. However, the orator highlights the shortcomings of this theory by mentioning that water solubility of casein will make it low elastic compared to the plastic wraps, leading to decreased taste and hygiene.
The author's final support is based on nutrition. He believes that casein contains abundent protein and other eadible substances which are healthy for bones and muscles. But the speaker weakens this theory by pointing out that people with milk allergy will face serious threats by using casein packages as they may suffer from dairy related allergic reactions.
In conclusion, although both reading passage and the orator discuss various characteristics of casein, the speaker casts aside each of the above mentioned author's beliefs by highlighting several reasons why the author's points are flawed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...everal benefits of utilizing milk casing to combat environmental hazards from pla...
^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun usefulness seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some usefulness'.
Suggestion: some usefulness
...rition benefits, the author illustrates several usefulness of casein packaging. However, the speak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... packaging. However, the speaker refutes the authors beliefs mentioning that the ...
^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... mentioning that the illustrated points arent convincing. First, the author mentio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d affinity to water and heat intolerance may need extra packaging, thereby increa...
^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... authors beliefs by highlighting several reasons why the authors points are flawe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.784 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83355889298 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4560494424 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162877239369 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060069906503 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375239605962 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877614450849 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434165182512 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.2367328918 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.42419426049 124% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.