free trade
TOEFL WRITING
The author in the reading and the professor in the lecture talk about the viability of free trade. Whilst, the author, agrees that free trade has innumerous advantages, the professor in the lecture contradicts his opinions and says that it has more disadvantages and fallacies.
Firstly, the author say that free trade enables international division of labour which makes each country specialise in an individual good/product. Furthermore, this results in better production and effective utilisation of goods which boosts the employment opportunities.
The author refutes all these opinions. He states that free trade does enable international division but does not result in specialisation of products and goods. The under developed countries face the brunt of this and are unable to keep up with the production due to limited resources. Therefore, the unemployment issue rises.
Secondly, the author asserts that free trade has increased the global output of products due to its cheaper prices. With large scale production, consumers tend to buy more, which has helped to increase the standard of living and make people more prosperous. The professor offsets all these points made by the author and present a conflicting theory. He claims that many people in these manufacturing industries do not hire local people. Instead, they hire people from cheaper labour nations and make the whole production offshore. This results in more product but not locally and thereby, does not support or create employment opportunity. Furthermore, it upgrades the standard of living of the richer people only.
Lastly, the author mentions that free trade has made the markets expand globally since the demands have increased. To satisfy these demands more labour is required to ensure timely delivery and therefore creating more job opportunities. The author neglects the arguments and posits that free trade has resulted into production of cheaper products. On top of this, cheaper price has made the whole situation worse. This has resulted into a highly unfavourable situation for the employees and resulted into decrease of job opportunities.
cheaper price
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 35, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cheaper
... cheaper price
^^^^^^^
Line 35, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cheaper price
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64179104478 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86330125846 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528358208955 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0642135574 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285981212682 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094718857718 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134806076762 0.0662205650399 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199332286706 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899057722451 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.