Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows. There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds.
The reading and the lecture are both discussing using specific solutions to prevent birds from crashing into glass windows. While the author of the reading offers three solutions to do that, the lecturer claims that each of them will not stop birds from flying through glass windows.
To begin with, the author argues that replacing regular glass with one-way glass would make bird unable to see in, thus they will not try to fly through. The lecturer challenges this specific argument by stating that a one-way glass window is a reflective object, and it might reflect the sky or the trees. Therefore, the bird might fly through it, because they cannot recognize the reflected picture from the real one.
Secondly, the writer states that if the architects designed windows with colorful patterns on them, bird will not trying to fly through these windows. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that birds will perceive the open spaces between the stripes and will try to fly through these halls. Unless if architects made these opening spaces too small, and in this case rooms inside the building would be so dark.
Finally, the author suggests that creating an artificial magnetic field would solve the problem. In the article, it is mentioned that birds use the earth's magnetic field to navigate their direction. Although the lecturer agrees that birds use a magnetic field while they are flying, but he illustrates that birds use this feature only when they traveling for long distances. And during the short flights the use their eyes and brightness of the light to navigate their directions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'try'
Suggestion: try
...olorful patterns on them, bird will not trying to fly through these windows. The lectu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08239700375 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31421278298 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3667542705 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.083333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251767325237 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897764063504 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629322816698 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141224575506 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547116242128 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.