Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window

The reading and the listening passages are both about prevention of birds injury. While the reading passage mentions three solutions that business can use to prevent birds injuries, the listening casts doubt on these three solutions.

The author of the reading states that one- way glass is a solution that could help birds not getting injuries by avoiding the glass. Also, it is mentioned that people in the building can see outside. The professor, however, contends that the reflex will work as a mirror. This a bad thing for birds because if the glass reflects a tree or sky, the birds will fly to them and that would not solve the problem.

In addition, the article says that painting colorful lines on windows would be a good solution since birds would avoid flying to them as well as a business would still be able to see through the opening. The lecturer, on the other hand, points out that birds will see the opening as holes, so they will fly to them. Also, if the opening were very small, the rooms in the building would be dark.

Finally, the writer mentions that companies could use the magnetic field as a solution. They can put a powerful electromagnetic that emit magnetic signals, so birds would avoid buildings because they have the ability to navigate in the right direction by using Earth’s magnetic fields. The professor rebuts this point by stating that it is true that birds use magnetic to navigate, but they use them to migrate or to travel a long distance such as from cold to a warm area. Moreover, they use only eyes and bright in short distance in cities. So, this is not a solution.

All in all, the lecturer debunks all three solutions.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, in addition, in short, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71525423729 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38976078754 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9360114704 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195212464104 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618158846815 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577759214985 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916710424478 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777782789962 0.0443174109184 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.