Global warming
The reading disagrees with the hypothesis that man is to be blamed for the current global warming we are experimenting. The lecturer cast doubts in all the author's claims regarding his ideas on global warming as a naturally occurring phenomenon. I will explain in this essay how the lecturer disagrees with the reading.
First, the lecturer contradicts the author regarding the idea that global warming is caused by the release of co2 from carbon sinks that have to occur naturally on Earth from the last 250.000 years. The lady explained that the carbon Isotope from carbon sinks is different from the carbon we use as fossil fuels, and not stating this is just one way how certain scientists bend information to suits they need.
Computer models do not only measure the GMST, but they also have much broader use in predicting future global temperatures. All computer models project an increase in global temperatures in the near future. Burning fuels account for 85% of the energy use, where do you think all that co2 ends up? In the atmosphere.
Lastly, regarding the fact that water vapor is the most abundant global warming gas that there is out there. The lecture explains that water vapor is like gasoline, it needs the smoking gun, in this case, the co2. it would be incorrect to blame water vapor as a cause for global warming
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...the smoking gun, in this case, the co2. it would be incorrect to blame water vapor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8347826087 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46311542932 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582608695652 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6301266266 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340999460984 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137627744735 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132324584968 0.0662205650399 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209364280388 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942148309967 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.