Global warming
The reading and the lecture are both about global warming. The author of the article feels that it's a natural phenomenon. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that global warming it's caused by man.
According to the reading the earth it's naturally warming. The article mentions that CO2 increase it's a natural process coming from carbon sinks. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that the CO2 from carbon sinks it's different from the one coming from fossil fuel. Additionally, he points out that nearly all the energy that we use comes from fossil fuel.
Secondly, the author suggests that computers can't predict future climate. In the article , it is said that they can't measure the ocean surface temperature ,being the best indicator of climate change. The lecturer, however, asserts that computers predicts prodact trends and climate change. He goes on to say that detailed analize it's not the only way to prove global warming.
Finally, the author posits that global warming can't be state that it's man made. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that it's proved that the cause of earth's increasing temperature it's the people. He notes that we should reduce our rependence on fossil fuel.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet 60
- Television appearance by university professors 76
- Driveless cars 76
- Endotherms dinossaurs 60
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...g. The author of the article feels that its a natural phenomenon. The lecturer disp...
^^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...le feels that its a natural phenomenon. The lecturer disputes the claims made in th...
^^^
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... The article mentions that CO2 increase its a natural process coming from carbon s...
^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease its a natural process coming from carbon sinks. This specific argument is ...
^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...dly, the author suggests that computers cant predict future climate. In the article ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t predict future climate. In the article , it is said that they cant measure the o...
^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... In the article , it is said that they cant measure the ocean surface temperature ,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt measure the ocean surface temperature ,being the best indicator of climate chan...
^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...He goes on to say that detailed analize its not the only way to prove global warmin...
^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., the author posits that global warming cant be state that its man made. In contrast...
^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ate that its man made. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that its proved that the cau...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... made. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that its proved that the cause of ear...
^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... cause of earths increasing temperature its the people. He notes that we should red...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02884615385 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38704676579 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7204360856 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.375 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 7.06452816374 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162490528143 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644628357513 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125032069196 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128343168698 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109933902755 0.0443174109184 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.