Smarr cars technology
The reading and lecturer are both about the advantages and disadvantages of the use of smart cars in the near future. The three ideas of the reading are in favor of the new technology. The lecturer challenges each one of the author ideas. I will explain how he does this.
First, the reading states that smart cars technology will produce safer driving conditions by avoiding collisions. The lecturer challenges this idea. On the contrary, even the most advanced technology fails and since this technology allows cars to travel at a short distance from each other, an accident will result in pile-ups. The lecturer concludes that there is little reason to believe that smart cars will be safer.
Secondly, regarding the idea that highway commuting will decrease the time of people driving to and back from work. The lecturer disputes this idea. She explains that every time a new convenience technology is launched, more people adhere to this resulting in more cars on the highway. Therefore, commuting will become a nightmare.
Lastly, according to the reading, the new technology will be less costly to drivers due to the fact that the GPT in cars will allow drivers to take not only the fastest but also the shortest route that there is. The Lecturer opposes this idea. She believes that this new technology, on the contrary, will be more expensive than traditional mechanical repairs. For example, the sensors that need to be installed in the cars and the GPT will be far more expensive than today's’ car parts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing are in favor of the new technology. The lecturer challenges each one of the aut...
^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vel at a short distance from each other, an accident will result in pile-ups. The...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t smart cars will be safer. Secondly, regarding the idea that highway commutin...
^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore, commuting will become a nightmare. Lastly, according to the reading, the ne...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9609375 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5917460962 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51953125 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.592756915 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.375 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209991575432 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676418504142 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820134948171 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139241194148 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759568640446 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.