The golden frog is a small bright-yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog's critical life functions, such as breathing. Conservationists have proposed a few solutions to the golden frog's fungus problem.
The article states that The golden frog, bright- yellow amphibian living in Panama's mountain streams, are endangered due to fungus that affect on the frogs' skin and prevent them to function properly, and proposing three measures to control this problem. However, the professor explains that these measures are ineffective and refutes each auther's reasons.
First, the reading claims that using bacterial protection as a natural enemy is one option to mitigate fungus' problem. The professor opposes this point by saying that these bacterias produce specific chemical material that may be work and have some positive influences, but they cannot last so long and stop working in rapid time.
Second, the article posits that breeding the frogs in captivity and releasing them in environment to compensate wild population is another solution. In contrast, the professor says the new frogs are likely be safe and stay healthy, but other animals use their territory, and they often bring new diseases with them. In addition, when new frong intoduce to their original habitat, they have same situation with fungus and even more diseases.
Third, the reading says that the forgs can use their body temperature to reduce growing fungus. The professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that this procedure has huge negative impacts on the frogs. According to the professor, produce high temperature by the frogs need high energy, and this trend make the frogs weak and lead them to become ill, even some major drawbacks like dead. Therefore, it is unlikely that the frogs be able to recover their population when they using this measure to kill fungus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...eams, are endangered due to fungus that affect on the frogs skin and prevent them to func...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, even so, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21348314607 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42186892451 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7290908745 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192502362239 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720544531307 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103558086995 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126871106072 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107246265168 0.0443174109184 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.