Group thinking
The reading and lecture both discusses the group-think, While the reading focus on its advantages but the lecture casts its implications by pointing out the several disadvantages.
First of all, the author suggests that the people can arrive superior decisions in a group which they cannot do so if they are doing same job individually. The lecturer, however, argues that one member can dominate the group and confirm his decision solely. He also focuses that each individual trying to confirms each other on their own decision and there may be some kind of disagreements between the members. He states that if somebody made objections on group decisions, there is the chance of rejection.
Secondly, the writer contends that employee takes more responsibility and there is also exchange of diverse knowledge when they work in group. The lecturer, on the other hand, rebuts this by mentioning that the employee are vulnerable of decisions. He mentions that, when they performs the duty independently, the lack of confidence might invite the bad consequences, He elaborates this point by providing the escaped prisoner.
At last, the the reading avers that when people worked in group, each individual encouraged other and everybody benefited. The lecturer however, challenges this by providing that the example that how the ford motor company have bankrupted when they are depend on the group decisions. He states that ford motor company have been bankrupted because of marketing disaster caused by the group decision making.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the reading focus on its advantages but the lecture casts its implications by po...
^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'confirm'.
Suggestion: confirm
... focuses that each individual trying to confirms each other on their own decision and t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ividual trying to confirms each other on their own decision and there may be some...
^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'perform'
Suggestion: perform
... decisions. He mentions that, when they performs the duty independently, the lack of con...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d consequences, He elaborates this point by providing the escaped prisoner. A...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ding the escaped prisoner. At last, the the reading avers that when people worked i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ding the escaped prisoner. At last, the the reading avers that when people worked i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...r company have bankrupted when they are depend on the group decisions. He states that ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31687242798 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82231931061 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.008120835 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.454545455 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247057848105 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894386168564 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622061331753 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139825922566 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546159068267 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.