Parents should be able to monitor and restrict which books, digital media or other information their children access at or check out of the public library.
Easily available news, books, and digital media might be harmful to the children. Although all kind information, what you read, is helpful to enhance the personal knowledge, sometimes, however people might be motivated in bad thing because of their immature decision. So parent have to check and restrict the accessibility of library information to their children.
First of all, in the developmental period, they are very curious of different information. Children are very prone to the victim of online news. For example in Nepal, there is not enough rule for the control of online site, which is easily available to the people who have internet access. Many children waste their time to make unnecessary videos—TikTok videos, emotional videos and others—that not only wasted their precious time for studying, but they are also prone to victim of online abuser. Immaturity can lead to bad consequences too. In public library also they can easily use such information and they might have been involved in other irrelevant activities too. Without monitoring their regular activities, parents could not know how they do in the online site. Many networking abuse, and other illegal activities can easily be done through online sites. In Nepal, police have reported that many child of age less than 13 years have involved in stealing the thing through making online gang. They misused the internet to connect the people like them.
Furthermore, not only the internet have bad result to their child some other age restricted information can be read easily so there might have been negative result to their child. Pornographic content, drug addiction and other unethical things might trigger them into negative activities. Though all kind of information is equally important for the development, they unable to decide which is good and which is bad, and always vulnerable to these bad information.
On other hand, internet and library is the great source of information. Myriad number of books, digital information, magazine, games is very helpful to enhance the child growth. Parent should encourage them to choose the good thing among the pile of information. Perhaps some child may be very interested in playing games and watching cartoons and while searching in the rack of the books he find the naked picture and other image and might be curious to know that and bring with him in home. In such case parent have to duty to discourage children to read the such content.
Nevertheless, library provides platform to read diverse knowledge and information, reader have to select the good things. Children are vulnerable to the bad information, their parents have to watch and monitor the check out of the public library.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 903, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun child seems to be countable; consider using: 'many children'.
Suggestion: many children
...es. In Nepal, police have reported that many child of age less than 13 years have involved...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to their child some other age restricted information can be read easily so there ...
^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...e searching in the rack of the books he find the naked picture and other image and m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for example, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18820861678 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6935587739 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480725623583 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1525152383 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4782608696 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1739130435 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286454609665 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850840989416 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920263476749 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178215108014 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613362908327 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.