groupthink, summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
The source discusses the advantages and disadvantages of working in groups. The passage talks about, many advantages of working in a group. however, the lecture contradicts the points and mention the disadvantages.
Firstly, the passage claim that working in teams as individuals can pool their intellectual resources in order to arrive at decision. Moreover, group discussion leads to a more varied and in-depth approach to problem-solving and idea creation. Notwithstanding, lecture argues that the decisions that are made considering the opinion of each individual can be very irrational the outcome may be unsatisfactory. she makes her point strong by giving an example, objections raised by the research team are being ignored by management.
Secondly, the passage argues that group discussion leads to a broad exchange of knowledge and information since group includes individuals from different parts and level of organization .in addition, the responsibility is spread around so that no particular member is responsible to a failure. However, lecture contradict by saying in team group members often starts believing that they are invulnerable.for example, agents fail to catch an escaped prisoner because they assume they could not be outsmarted by one person.
Finally, the passage says that froup discussion encourages motivation in a team member, on the other hand, it also has a lot of disadvantage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... many advantages of working in a group. however, the lecture contradicts the points and...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...onal the outcome may be unsatisfactory. she makes her point strong by giving an exa...
^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ifferent parts and level of organization .in addition, the responsibility is sprea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59259259259 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27577622504 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9376529917 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097141460391 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394792889684 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539082378792 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524411495878 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315418065352 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.