The reading and lecturer are both about the group think which help to solve the assigned task. The author of reading mentions the advantages of the group decisions. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is the opinion that group think has some disadvantages which leads to disaster decisions.
To begin with, the author argues that group can pool their intellectual resources to lead to superior decisions. The article also mentions that group discussions leads to different and in-depths approach to dealing problem and coming with ideas. This specific arguments is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that decision made by individuals are often ignored by the management. Additionally, he says that individual think group decision are irrational and predicts the outcome to be unsatisfactory.
Secondly, the writer suggests that group think leads to wide exchange of ideas and information among each other. In the article, it is said that individuals tends to bring a large variety of skills, knowledge and interests. The lecturer, however rebuts this by mentioning that, they started feel invulnerable. He elaborates on this by mentioning some incident of law enforcement agents failing to catch an escaped prisoner because they predicted they could not be outsmarted by one.
Finally, the author posits that group think encourages or motivate team members. Moreover, in the article it is said that it brings enthusiasm and provides necessary ambiance which benefits each of them. In the contrast, the lecturer's position is that individual tries to assures their decision to be correct. He extends by giving example of ford company which was intended to bring revolution in automobile but fails to deliver and was on the verge of bank corrupt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the advantages of the group decisions. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nk has some disadvantages which leads to disaster decisions. To begin with, th...
^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by individuals are often ignored by the management. Additionally, he says that i...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h other. In the article, it is said that individuals tends to bring a large varie...
^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dge and interests. The lecturer, however rebuts this by mentioning that, they sta...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that group think encourages or motivate team members. Moreover, in the article ...
^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...group think encourages or motivate team members. Moreover, in the article it is ...
^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lecturers position is that individual tries to assures their decision to be co...
^^
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ution in automobile but fails to deliver and was on the verge of bank corrupt.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30496453901 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83254988769 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556737588652 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3930325287 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0743848863359 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302091674637 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471379900058 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493725682035 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359305015859 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.