gthsgvfd
Discipline is the self esteem that can be achieved either by using power or by withholding of affection from the ones whom the discipline is to be taught. The passage shows the three strategies for disciplining children that is power which includes the use of physical punishment such as spanking or the threat of physical punishment. According to the professor, some psychologist believes that discipline can be inferred with punishment while other believes that it can be inferred without physical punishment. Parents can enforce good behavior naturally and physical punishment should be given if bad behavior is found among the children.
There is another way of incorporating discipline among children by withholding of affection that is taking away them from using the car or taking the toy from the child. But the professor's view on effective behavior is that good behavior can by reinforced by the parent by inculcating good values and by teaching them good things rather then punishing them or withholding them from their affection. The professor also tells that discipline can produce healthy level of good values among children which will alleviate them to be successful and become a better person.
On the final verdict, Discipline should be inculcated by good behavior and values rather than by physical punishment or withholding of affection according to the professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...and by teaching them good things rather then punishing them or withholding them from...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230434782609 0.261695866417 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.204347826087 0.158904122519 129% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0826086956522 0.0723426182421 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0304347826087 0.0435111971325 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0304347826087 0.0277247811725 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.15652173913 0.128828473217 121% => OK
Participles: 0.095652173913 0.0370669169778 258% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.90460947433 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0173913043478 0.0208969081088 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0869565217391 0.128158765124 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0391304347826 0.0158828679856 246% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0260869565217 0.0114777025283 227% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1388.0 1645.83664459 84% => OK
No of words: 220.0 271.125827815 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30909090909 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395454545455 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318181818182 0.287516216867 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.277272727273 0.187439937562 148% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.177272727273 0.113142543107 157% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90460947433 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486363636364 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.0001481079 53.8517498576 80% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0529801325 61% => OK
Sentence length: 27.5 21.7502111507 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2056172413 49.3711431718 53% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.5 132.220823453 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 21.7502111507 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 59.3181818182 50.5018328374 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.81967213115 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.188964680607 0.142949733639 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0457908462607 0.0787303798458 58% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.67563080401 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13945461337 0.139662658121 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.445378824789 0.414875509568 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00793778470009 0.0530846634433 15% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 5.0 10.2958057395 49% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.