People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author's claim about people who make decision based on emotion and then justify those decision with logic are poor decision makers is viable to a certain extent. It may hold true in some places while false in other places. In today's world, people who thinks on an intellectual level than being emotional at the time of decision making have greater chance of success.
People who are nonplussed about what to do in certain situation sometimes thinks on a emotional level. They tend to listen to their heart rather than brain and then to give justification, they start making logic which made them to take the particular decision. This can harnessed the situation rather than alleviating it. People who thinks intellectually seek to gather all the pros and cons while making any decision. Let us consider the example of trust who give education loan to the students. If a children who have better financial stability beg for sanctioning of larger amount of fees and being emotional, they sanction the money to that student which is greater when compared to the amount sanctioned to the students who is indigent. This is not fair on side of that indigent child and is regarded as a poor decision. If that trust have thought on pragmatic level rather than being emotional, then the decision would have been better.
The author's claim might not hold true when it come to the politics. Here, the candidate has to take some decision considering the emotions of the residents of his or her area. At the time of the elections, the candidate has to think of the emotions of the citizen rather than being intellectual in order to win the election. Many residents desires to have their problems solved first. In order to lure the people towards him or her, they opt for the emotional decision and then they show to other people on what basis the it was made. They try to make logic towards that decision and claims about how beneficial the decision will be.
In sum, people should make decision based on the requirement of the situation. They should be aboveboard on their part rather that creating some faulty logic around it. This will help them to alleviate their decision making power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n certain situation sometimes thinks on a emotional level. They tend to listen to...
^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...give education loan to the students. If a children who have better financial stability beg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...pos;s claim might not hold true when it come to the politics. Here, the candidate ha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'desire'.
Suggestion: desire
...der to win the election. Many residents desires to have their problems solved first. In...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...they show to other people on what basis the it was made. They try to make logic toward...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222222222222 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.178743961353 0.157235817809 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0748792270531 0.0880659088768 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0410628019324 0.0497285424764 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0555555555556 0.0444667217837 125% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113526570048 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0507246376812 0.0406280797675 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45669417315 2.79330140395 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.048309178744 0.030933414821 156% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106280193237 0.0997080785238 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0193236714976 0.0249443105267 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.036231884058 0.0148568991511 244% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2207.0 2732.02544248 81% => OK
No of words: 380.0 452.878318584 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80789473684 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.323684210526 0.366273622748 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.207894736842 0.280924506359 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165789473684 0.200843997647 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105263157895 0.132149295362 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45669417315 2.79330140395 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478947368421 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 50.8439865164 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4423298296 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.35 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.35 0.674092028746 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 39.7894736842 51.4728631049 77% => OK
Elegance: 1.40350877193 1.64882698954 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386096693244 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121103188518 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.108464728209 0.077325440228 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496587644834 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153531471836 0.149214159877 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148628172141 0.161403998019 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937603125643 0.0892212321368 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.444186353859 0.385218514788 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0761719445609 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273753017001 0.275328986314 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535516002986 0.0653680567796 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.