An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The International Development Organization wants to engineered a new breed of millet which has high proportion of Vitamin A. Here,it is not mentioned the reason behind the deficiency of the vitamin A in Tagus. The organization should found the core reason behind the deficiency of Vitamin A. There may be various reason behind the deficiency. There may be paucity of the foods which are highly rich in vitamin A.
In the second prong, the organization tells us that cost of the new millet is more comparatively and government should give subsidies for farming the new variety of Millet. Did the new variety of Millet with same Vitamin content cannot be grown by alternative means? There may be alternative for this which will reduce the cost of the new Millet to have benefits on both side that is for government as well as farmers. The committee should search for other alternatives to abhor the level of deficiency in the nation.
Millet being a staple food in Tagus, it does not mean that people will accept the new variety. The new variety may differ in various things from old variety such as taste, size, etc. Those people who disliked the taste of new variety will abstain from using Millet and this is not going to solve the problem. A sample should be distributed to the residents of Tagus and review should be taken about it and after the necessary changes, it should be adopted. Since the price of new Millet will be high, it will be difficult for the farmers to do farming and to eschew this problem, the government have to provide subsidies to the farmers. This will led the government to collect funds to provide subsidies. The government have to take various measures to raise the funds for the new variety of Millet.
If Millet being the only way with which this deficiency can be combated, then government should do everything to promote this product. Before this, the government should be cent percent sure about the product and then do the necessary awareness campaign to spread awareness.
In sum, I would like to conclude by saying that government should find the core reason behind the deficiency. They should also find the alternative to the new product and help the citizen to combat the deficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...h has high proportion of Vitamin A. Here,it is not mentioned the reason behind the ...
^^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...its on both side that is for government as well as farmers. The committee should search fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 648, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ide subsidies to the farmers. This will led the government to collect funds to prov...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257211538462 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.158653846154 0.15541462614 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0721153846154 0.0836205057962 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.03125 0.0520304965353 60% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0192307692308 0.0272364105082 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117788461538 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.03125 0.0416121511921 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59287133712 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0432692307692 0.026700313972 162% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.132211538462 0.113004496875 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0552884615385 0.0255425247493 216% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0144230769231 0.0127820249294 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2236.0 2731.13054187 82% => OK
No of words: 384.0 446.07635468 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82291666667 6.12365571057 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3515625 0.378187486979 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223958333333 0.287650121315 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.140625 0.208842608468 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106770833333 0.135150697306 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59287133712 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 207.018472906 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.469332199767 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.7450711981 52.1807786196 88% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2105263158 23.2022227129 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2137862527 57.7814097925 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.684210526 141.986410481 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 23.2022227129 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.724660767414 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 42.6063596491 51.9672348444 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.94252873563 1.8405768891 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452919804226 0.441005458295 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.210539467885 0.135418324435 155% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.113230659107 0.0829849096947 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.657036899816 0.58762219726 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.1454887721 0.147661913831 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204824211931 0.193483328276 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103432278891 0.0970749176394 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.492413481414 0.42659136922 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103693716741 0.0774707102158 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299216579087 0.312017818177 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13290928142 0.0698173142475 190% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.33743842365 120% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.