There is some disagreements between the author and the lecturer over the issue of whether the "cloud seeding" technique is effective in preventing Hail, pieces of ice that fall from the clouds, from damaging crops in farms.
The author of the passage states that cloud seeding is an effective solution because it makes clouds produce only snow or rain instead of ice. The lecturer agrees with this fact but she also mentions that this technique might cause drought in farms due to the fact that silver iodide can destroy snow and rain along with the ice.
Again, the author argues that cloud seeding technique has already been proven to be effective in Asian countries. However. the lecturer refutes the aforementioned statement by saying that this technique was only used in cities in Asian countries and the high air pollution in cities can provide a more favorable situation than in farms. Because of this fact, there is no way to know whether this technique would solve the problem of Hail raining on farms in rural areas.
Finally, the author contends that local studies also support the effectiveness of cloud seeping technique. According to the writing, the areas where this technique was used was less damaged than the previous years. On the other hand, the lecturer states that this not only occured in the local area where the study was conducted, but also happened in adjacent areas. Which means that this might be due to the natural causes and might have nothing to do with the cloud seeding technique.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are some disagreements'?
Suggestion: There are some disagreements
There is some disagreements between the author and the lecturer ove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ven to be effective in Asian countries. However. the lecturer refutes the aforementione...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... effective in Asian countries. However. the lecturer refutes the aforementioned sta...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96887159533 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43070787576 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533073929961 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1533312735 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.7 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183014425362 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729476782896 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064961730365 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129496229677 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730479700279 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.