Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met
The reading passage and the speaker most certainly disagree on the topic of just how a method known as " cloud seeding " have been effective in protecting crops from hail. The professor casts doubt on this claim and rejects each of the authors' point.
First at all, the reading passage explains how on this method the clouds are sprayed using the chemical silver iodine from an airplane. This makes the clouds produce harmless rain and or snow instead of hail. However, the professor points out that this method is not clear at all. Cloud seeding prevent any kind of precipitation not only hail. Less snow and rain can cause more drough and lack of water to the crops.
In addition, the reading passage states that cloud seeding have been sucesfully use in some Asia countries to control precipitacions in urban areas. On the other hand the speaker explains how this method can not be repeated in agricultural areas on United States. Urbans areas with high pollution levels favor cloud seeding.
Finally, the article points out that local studies support the use of this method to decrease the damage on farming regions. The speaker is not convinced with the use of this method. Hail damage had decrease also on some urbans areas due to some natural variation. Cloud seeding was not considered a factor on the disminution of hail rain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the speaker most...
^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tainly disagree on the topic of just how a method known as ' cloud seeding &...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d rejects each of the authors point. First at all, the reading passage explai...
^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t all. Cloud seeding prevent any kind of precipitation not only hail. Less snow ...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation not only hail. Less snow and rain can cause more drough and lack of water ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...drough and lack of water to the crops. In addition, the reading passage states ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...seeding have been sucesfully use in some Asia countries to control precipitacions...
^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not be repeated in agricultural areas on United States. Urbans areas with high po...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollution levels favor cloud seeding. Finally, the article points out that loc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tor on the disminution of hail rain.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, so, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33968394938 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3524307326 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200865033157 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778005752007 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569008482507 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127641050979 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213062913792 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.