In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explorers.
The reading passage and the listening passage most certainly disagree on the topic of just about the discovering of silver coin, dating from the eleventh century on an archaeological site on Maine in the United States.
First of all, the reading passage mentions that the silver coin is not genuine by stating that the site were the coin was discovered is far away from Norse settlements documented sites. However, the professor explains that archaeologists believe that the silver coin is not fake. The professor states that North American traveled long distances that they could reach Norse settlements and brought silver coin with them to the places were the coin was found.
In addition, the article claims that there is not evidence that other coins were found in Canada, the sites that were inhabited by the Nors. On the other hand, the professor explains that Norse did not stay permanently in one place, They would be packing their possessions and forgot to pack all coins with them.
Finally, the reading passage states that Norse did not bring coins with them when they traveled from Canada to North America because coins were useless for them. The professor points out this argument. He explains that coins could were not considered for North Americans as money but silver coin were very attractive. North Americans found silver coins useful for necklaces and jewelry that they could trade them with Norses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the listening pa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age most certainly disagree on the topic of just about the discovering of silver ...
^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oin, dating from the eleventh century on an archaeological site on Maine in the U...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al site on Maine in the United States. First of all, the reading passage mentio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the site were the coin was discovered is far away from Norse settlements documen...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered is far away from Norse settlements documented sites. However, the professor...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the places were the coin was found. In addition, the article claims that the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rticle claims that there is not evidence that other coins were found in Canada, t...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... forgot to pack all coins with them. Finally, the reading passage states that...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut this argument. He explains that coins could were not considered for North Amer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, so, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07659574468 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36629417472 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506382978723 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4396669299 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293697884702 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134670271698 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769680726961 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198389130616 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820326875853 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.