high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods
The article states that considering high taxes for cigarette and unhealthy food could have copious social benefits and provides three reasons of support. however, the professor explains that it can be a challenge and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that high taxes will be discouraged people to eat unhealthy food or smoke. The professor refutes this point by stating that it does not lead to healthier behavior. For example, some people who tend to smoke cigarette and not want to quit it, will buy cheaper cigarettes which have lower quality. These have more harmful substances than high quality cigarettes, so that it might be presented greater health risk. Another example for unhealthy food is that people who continue to eat unhealthy food, by paying taxes on them, will have less money for buying healthy food.
Second, the article claims that taxes of this kind are financially fair and will be shifted financial burden from all the society to just those who choose to take part in the unhealthy activities. however, the professor contends that there are different ways of thinking about fairness. For example, such taxes do not take into account the income of people who have to pay the taxes. In this way, people with the lower-income must pay as much as the person who has the higher income and they will carry much greater burden.
Third, the reading avers that the high taxation will increase the revenue for the government and it has benefit for everyone. The lecture opposes this point by the government earn a lot of money in this way each year. it does not lose such an income, otherwise, it may be define some banning open place for person who are smoking, so that they are not allowed to smoke there.
Therefore, in the listening, the professor asserts that it can be a challenge by pointing out three potential problems in the plan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... and provides three reasons of support. however, the professor explains that it can be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... take part in the unhealthy activities. however, the professor contends that there are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n a lot of money in this way each year. it does not lose such an income, otherwise...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90712074303 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38866076217 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6980998326 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294083037454 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098408150299 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136419311455 0.0662205650399 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160208584291 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154676636826 0.0443174109184 349% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.