The reading and the lecture talk about the humpback whales. The author believes that this creatures rely on the stars to navigate while migrating. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author.
First of all, the author claims that the humpback whales possess a high degree of intelligence that able them to rely on the night sky for their orientation. The lecturer refutes this point. He explains that there is no connection between the intelligence of the whales and the use of the stars. He gives the example of the birds. This kind of creatures have the ability of using the stars despite they don't possess a high level of intelligence.
Second, the author explains that compared to other animals who use a certain external objects or force to maintain their movement in a straight way, the whales, on the other hand, rely on the sky visual at night to maintain their direction with a long rage of distance. The professor, opposes this argument. He put on forth the idea that whales are bio magnetic creatures, which make them a sensitive creatures and the force suggested by the magnetism field able them to move for a long distance in the same direction.
Third, the author proposes that the spy-hopping behaviour defined by floating whales on the surface of the water, explain that the whales are looking to the stars. The lecturer opposes this explanation. He says that spy hopping is made by other animals like shark. In addition this behaviour is made during the day where no presence of the stars. Which explains that the whales don't really rely on the night vision stars during this act.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...mpback whales. The author believes that this creatures rely on the stars to navigate...
^^^^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the stars to navigate while migrating. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ability of using the stars despite they dont possess a high level of intelligence. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'object'?
Suggestion: object
...ther animals who use a certain external objects or force to maintain their movement in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straight way" with adverb for "straight"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cts or force to maintain their movement in a straight way, the whales, on the other hand, rely on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...is made by other animals like shark. In addition this behaviour is made during the day w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the day where no presence of the stars. Which explains that the whales dont really re...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e stars. Which explains that the whales dont really rely on the night vision stars d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, really, second, so, third, while, in addition, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79642857143 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45021604628 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478571428571 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.3814438962 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9375 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201433913139 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060804041795 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856288850316 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117849604708 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563647317523 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.