Integrated 45
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the possibility of bees’ existence on Earth as early as 200 million years ago. In the reading section, the writer contends that skeptics cast doubts on the existence of bees and provides three reasons for support; however, the professor refutes reading points by indicating that the arguments are not convincing.
First of all, the writer claims that there are no fossil remains related to the 200 million years ago; in contrast the professor states that although there are not fossils of bees related to 200 million years ago, it does not mean that bees did not exist at that time. Actually, there were not proper situations in order to preserve fossils of bees. Fossils of bees could preserve in trees with risen which is sticky liquid; however these kinds of trees were rare at that part of time.
Moreover, the reading passage holds the view that the flowering plants which are closely connected to bees have not existed; on the contrary, the lecturer underlines the fact that bees at first fed on non-flowering trees such as fern and pine trees and after a revolutionary history, flowering plants have evolved.
In addition, the writer mentions that since the fossilized chamber do not have spiral pattern, it is likely that structures are related to the other insects; conversely, the professor indicates that even though fossilized do not have spiral pattern, chemical analysis shows that they use special water to build chambers; as a result these distinctive compositions prove that fossilized structures are related to the bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fossils'?
Suggestion: fossils
...ll, the writer claims that there are no fossil remains related to the 200 million year...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256055363322 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.173010380623 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0622837370242 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0726643598616 0.0435111971325 167% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0103806228374 0.0277247811725 37% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141868512111 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0449826989619 0.0370669169778 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.54989982306 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0242214532872 0.0208969081088 116% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103806228374 0.128158765124 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00346020761246 0.0158828679856 22% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0103806228374 0.0114777025283 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1586.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 261.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07662835249 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35632183908 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291187739464 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.195402298851 0.187439937562 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11877394636 0.113142543107 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54989982306 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524904214559 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 50.7717752171 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 37.2857142857 21.7502111507 171% => OK
Sentence length SD: 112.353669005 49.3711431718 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 226.571428571 132.220823453 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.2857142857 21.7502111507 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 0.878197800319 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 66.4044882321 50.5018328374 131% => OK
Elegance: 1.72972972973 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.24992159367 0.142949733639 175% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0549451525857 0.0787303798458 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.792427326829 0.631733273073 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172237250057 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.294073849812 0.414875509568 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0392005364478 0.0530846634433 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.