Jane austin painting
The reading and the lecture are both about Jane Austen self-portrait whether it her or not. Whereas the author of the reading states that this painting resembles Jane and provide some evidence, the lecturer suggest that the painting did not resemble Jane. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, some members of Austen's family agrees that this painting is for her. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that cannot be possible. Furthermore, he mentions that it was 70 years since Jane died so there is no way one her living family have seen her alive.
Secondly, the reading states that portrait represent one of the sketches in Cassandra's. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He argues that Austen family is a big family. In addition, he points out that the family have a lot of teenagers.
Finally, the reading claims that the style of the painting shows it is similar to Ozias Humphrey and he was active in the same year when Jane was a teenager. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that the one who sells the canvas did not sell any canvas in London until Jane was 27 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... her living family have seen her alive. Secondly, the reading states that portra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76777251185 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40985823747 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563981042654 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3508870407 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3846153846 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19907703958 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627821759004 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918682399833 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122529795692 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869945285689 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.