Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss whether the populations of wild koalas will likely continue to decline. The reading poses three pieces of evidence that make the koalas population decrease. However, the professor in the lecture disagrees with the reading statements by stating three refutations.
First of all, the reading passage mentions that the loss of habitat will treat the koalas. Nonetheless, the professor opposes the statement by stating that planting trees can solve the problems of habitat loss. Furthermore, since the planting should be done strategically to prevent fragmentation, scientists suggest creating the vegetation corridors to reconnect the fragmented habitats or treeless land. With the long narrow strip of trees that connect different parts of the forest, koalas can follow these paths from one forest patch to another. Therefore, he believes that the koalas’ population will not decrease by using the approach of planting vegetation corridors.
Secondly, the passage proposes that automobile collision may be the second reason to make koalas’ population decrease. Yet, the scholar opposes because the automobile collision influences can be reduced by setting wildlife crossings The Australian government utilize the water-carrying tunnel to be the wildlife crossings, so the koalas can walk on the platform built above the water level inside the tunnel to pass the road. With these tunnels, koalas can move under the road safely and without getting wet. Consequently, he thinks that the automobile collision event are decreasing due to the setting of the koalas’ wildlife crossings.
Last but not least, the reading poses fencing is a major obstacle to koalas living in the urban areas.
Nevertheless, the lecturer disputes the statement since it can solve this problem by planting trees nearby the fences. since the koalas have a hard time climbing on the fence through the flat ground, it is better to plant trees near the fence to build the natural ladder for koalas. Additionally, another way to build the koalas’ climbing paths is to use tall wooden pole and lean it against the fence to create an angle. Hence, he does not think that the fence will be the reason that decrease the population of koalas.
In conclusion, the professor disagrees with the reading statements. that is, he thinks the habitat losing, automobile collision, and fencing problems can be solved to prevent the koalas’ population decrease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'koalas'' or 'koala's'?
Suggestion: koalas'; koala's
... three pieces of evidence that make the koalas population decrease. However, the profe...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...em by planting trees nearby the fences. since the koalas have a hard time climbing on...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
... disagrees with the reading statements. that is, he thinks the habitat losing, autom...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1373.03311258 153% => OK
No of words: 388.0 270.72406181 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40463917526 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74857207926 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502577319588 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 419.366225166 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0049153028 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.368421053 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344975917363 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123165931613 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116618260994 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201610344878 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610284246518 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.